Thoracic surgery in Egypt.

General thoracic surgery operations in Egypt are performed mainly by cardiothoracic surgeons and less oftenly by dedicated thoracic surgeons and general surgeons. This is mainly due to the relatively small number of thoracic surgeons in relation to population as only 210 cardiothoracic surgery specialists and 458 consultants are registered with the Egyptian Medical Syndicate (EMS) in a country with a population of more than 100 million people. Thoracic surgeons in Egypt are faced with a number of burdens, including the need to propagate the service to advanced technology infront of the obstacle of limited resources. Other burdens include higher incidence of TB, trauma and foreign body inhalation related to cultural backgrounds. More centres now are major video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) providing centres and others are specialized in more complex surgeries like complicated airway procedures and radical surgery for mesothelioma. As part of the international community, the COVID-19 pandemic has put more burdens on the thoracic surgery service as most centres have reduced their elective surgery workload to less than half of usual. Interestingly, the pandemic has allowed a self-referral screening programme with widespread Computed Tomography (CT) chest being performed among the population allowing thoracic surgeons to operate more on early stage lung cancer. The academic challenges for thoracic surgeons are even more with need for developing national databases. Nevertheless, thoracic surgeons in Egypt are optimistic regarding the future. The rising interest among the younger population will push training programs to meet the interests of enthusiastic junior surgeons. While the ancient history of thoracic surgery in Egypt seems to be extraordinary, the future perspectives promise to be more rewarding.

Ergonomical Assessment of Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

In this study. we compared ergonomical domains characteristics of three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) video-systems in thoracoscopic lobectomy using a scoring-scale-based assessment. Seventy patients (mean age, 69 ± 6.9 years, 43 males and 27 females) with early stage lung cancer were randomized to undergo thoracoscopic lobectomy by either 3D (N = 35) or 2D (N = 35) video-systems. All operations were divided into 5 standardized surgical steps (vein, artery, bronchus, fissure, and lymph nodes), which were evaluated by 4 thoracic surgeons using a scoring scale (score range from 1, unsatisfactory to 3,excellent) entailing assessment of 3 ergonomical domains: exposure, instrumentation and maneuvering. Primary outcome was a difference ≥10% in the maneuvering domain steps. At intergroup comparisons, there was no difference in demographics. The 3D system results were better for maneuvering domain total score and particularly for the artery and bronchus steps scores (score ≥10%, P ≤ 0.006). Other significant differences included exposure of the vein, artery and bronchus (P ≤ 0.03). Results favoring the 2D system included maneuvering, exposure and instrumentation of the fissure (P = 0.001). Inter-rater concordance of ergonomics scoring was satisfactory (Cronbach's α range, 0.85-0.88). Operative time was significantly shorter in the 3D group (127 ± 19 min vs 143±18 min, P = 0.001) whereas there was no difference in hospital stay (3.4 ± 1.2 vs 4.1 ± 1.6 days, P = 0.07). In this study comparison of ergonomic domains scoring in 3D versus 2D thoracoscopic lobectomy favored the 3D system for the maneuvering total score, which proved inversely correlated with operative times possibly due to a better perception of depth and more precise surgical maneuvering.

Should Moderate Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation Be Repaired During Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Disease?

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair of concomitant functional moderate tricuspid valve (TV) regurgitation at the time of mitral valve (MV) surgery remains controversial. AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of concomitant repair of functional moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) during MV surgery for rheumatic valve disease. METHOD: From 1998 to 2016, 1,240 patients had rheumatic MV disease associated with moderate functional TR: 974 patients had MV surgery and concomitant TV repair (group 1) and 266 patients had MV surgery alone (group 2). Study endpoints were operative outcomes, rehospitalisation for congestive heart failure (CHF), and TV reintervention. Propensity score matching identified 192 well-matched pairs for outcomes comparison. RESULTS: Patients who had concomitant TV repair were younger (p=0.02) and there were fewer diabetics (p=0.015). In matched patients, low cardiac output was significantly higher in group 2 (p=0.044) and there was no difference in ventilation time, intensive care unit stay, cardiopulmonary bypass, and ischaemic times (p=0.480, p=0.797, p=0.232, and p=0.550, respectively) between groups. Patients in group 2 required more TV reintervention (1 vs 35 in group 1 and 2, respectively; p=0.004) and rehospitalisation for CHF (5 vs 40 in group 1 and 2, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant TV repair for moderate TR in patients undergoing rheumatic MV surgery was not associated with increased operative risk. Postoperative low cardiac output syndrome and the risk of late TV reinterventions and rehospitalisation for CHF were lower with TV repair. Concomitant repair of the moderate TV regurgitation maybe beneficial for patients undergoing rheumatic MV surgery.

Surgery for Active Infective Endocarditis of the Aortic Valve With Infection Extending Beyond the Leaflets.

BACKGROUND: The optimal aortic substitute in extensive aortic valve active infective endocarditis (AIE) continues to be debated. To determine the surgical approach in aortic valve AIE with infection extension beyond the leaflets, we evaluated the outcome of reconstructive surgery with various valve substitutes in those patients. METHODS: During 2000-2013, 168 patients had surgery for extensive aortic valve AIE. Patients were categorised based on aortic valve substitute: Group A: Stented aortic valve replacement (AVR), Group B: Stented AVR with patch support, Group C: Stentless valve, Group D: Aortic allograft, and Group E: Composite valve graft. Outcome parameters were mortality, postoperative cardiogenic or septic shock, stroke, or reinfection. RESULTS: Stented valves with patch support were more frequently utilised in cases of native valve endocarditis (p<0.001). Postoperative complications were comparable among groups. Concomitant preoperative extension of infection in the mitral valve predicted reinfection (OR 3.6; confidence interval 1.46-8.66; p=0.005). Survival was not affected by operative group (log rank=0.6). Univariable preoperative predictors of mortality were: septic shock (hazard ratio 8.3; 95% confidence interval 3.6-19.2; p<0.001), ejection fraction (hazard ratio 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.93-0.99; p=0.006), preoperative cardiogenic shock (hazard ratio 1.9; 95%CI 1.1-3.6, p=0.02) and concomitant mitral valve surgery (hazard ratio 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.5; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of extensive aortic valve infective endocarditis remains a challenge. Outcomes were not affected by the surgical complexity of aortic reconstruction procedure or valve substitute. Surgical approach should be tailored to individual patient's characteristics.